S U P E R I O R     L I G H T     C R A F T     S A I L I N G     R I G S

Happy sailing!

Wing Sails Co.
(see movie)
Welcome to the home of the most promising sail design today!

 

 

Welcome to the home of the most promising sail design today !

A pretty bold statement, isn't it? Well, here is why:

Some of you might be familiar with solid wingsails used by speed record challengers and C Class catamarans. Although aerodynamically superb, they are absolutely inadequate for everyday sailing: impractical, complex and expensive. On the other hand, traditional single membrane sails have everything that rigid wingsails lack - except aerodynamic efficiency. When was the last time a speed record attempt was made with thin sails? Not to mention breaking a record...

So, how can we merge the advantages of those two very different concepts? There is only one solution: a SOFT WINGSAIL that can approximate the shape of an ideal wing on either tack, yet can be lowered, reefed and twisted; moreover, it must be light, simple, inexpensive to make and easy to handle. This particular sail has it all. There have been several two-dimensional solutions of a flexible wingsail around, based on battens or ribs - but none of them have proved viable and the projects seem to have been abandoned.

Battens are still fine for fixed wings, but for structures that are supposed to flex and change their shape according to the tack - you better forget it. A French expert wrote to me recently: "Your pictures don't give any information on the construction of your sail. If there are no battens and camber inducers, and the shape is stable up to thirty knots of wind, then we might give it a try".

Soft wingsails without battens? There is only one, and I'm pleased to offer it for your consideration.
So, should I fire another, even bolder statement? Since I do not have the power to prove that THIS IS the best sail, I'll just repeat: this is the most promising sail design today!

Wingsails sufficiently large for propelling racing and cruising yachts need development that would require the involvement of experts on aerodynamics, designers and manufacturers. I'll be very happy when this time comes, but that is not up to me. One thing is certain - the market exists: many sailors, and paddlers interested in sailing with their kayaks/canoes as well, either wanted to order a sail, or have shown a keen interest in the possibilities this sail offers.

Since the launching of this website in September 2001, I have received hundreds of inquiries and comments. Many people have read articles about this sail in "Professional Boatbuilder", "Wavelength Magazine", "New South Wales Sea Kayaker magazine" and Swiss "See Meile". Several enthusiasts addressed a possibility of applying the wingsail on large monohulls, catamarans and proas. There were a couple of far fetching queries, like:
"I am interested in any information you have about the use of wing sails in larger craft. My interest is in eco-friendly boats. Without the challenge of conventional sails." and "the design of a saling hydrofoil able to sail at a speed over the current WR which is 46 knots. I consider that the use of one of your soft sails may have many advantages for the hydrofoil project, because of the easiness of handling, in particular rising and lowering the rig every sailing day."


I have exchanged thoughts and ideas with some of the leading experts and racers, and have offered this design to naval architects, yacht designers and builders, sailmakers, iceboat-, landyacht- and kayak manufacturers worldwide - still in vain.
The first obstacle is that wingsails require rotational masts. Technically, the mast can be stayed, but freestanding masts are absolutely favourable. Some people wondered if it was possible to have a 30 or 50 feet mast unstayed. Well, there was the Team Philips, the British challenge for the Race around the World in 2000 - it had two freestanding/rotational wingmasts nearly 130 feet high! Everything is possible with today's technological advances. In spite of numerous advantages of unstayed rigs, and the works of Garry Hoyt and Eric Sponberg in particular, stays are still a standard and almost mandatory solution. Let me quote Eric Sponberg ("Project Amazon and the Unstayed Rig", Professional Boatbuilder No. 55): "...Standing rigging was taken for granted. While many evolutionary changes have occured in rig design over the years - most notably in new materials, first with metals, then with composites - standing rigging still remains bound inside the rating rules with no relief in sight. Wires in the rig, and, therefore, triangular-shaped sails, are by now so inbred into our industry and our thinking, that we blindly accept them without question. And so triangular sails prevail."

When in 1925 the regatta committee of the New York Yacht Club heard of L. Francis Herreshoff's new patented rotating mast design, it promptly passed the rule prohibiting "revolving masts, double luffed sails, and similar contrivances". This prohibition is still in place!

So, however strange it may seem, sailing rig design and development is not only influenced, but recklessly limited by racing rules. One explanation I received was that even purely cruising and recreation oriented sailors might want to try their hand at a race some day. Those who don't want to be tied up are gradually accepting novel rigs (rotating wing masts, AeroRig...).
Should we blame racing rules for preventing sailors to enjoy faster and safer boats?
Of course not - the rules are written by 'rulers'...

Clearly, there is room for sailing rig improvements, but who is going to carry this progress on if the industry is reluctant to enter this 'greyish area'? And on what basis, if not on this sail (or a similar one, which is not very probable)?

I have two articles on sailboat stability and there are certainly many more. One is titled "The Search for Stability", by Barry Deakin of WUMTIA. The other is "In Search of Vanishing Stability" by Bill Schanen III, Editor and Publisher of Sailing Magazine. The titles say enough: sailboat stability has become a problem. A combination of wind and breaking waves has been found to be the main culprit for the capsizing of sailing yachts. The design of hulls, keels and ballasts is constantly being improved, but the "stability" is not. Still, nobody wants to look above the deck to the real culprit - single membrane sails taken for granted. Let me ask a simple question: if two identical hulls sail in the same adverse conditions, at the same speed, one heeled 30 degrees, another 45 degrees - which one has a better chance of capsizing? The answer should be obvious.
How do we reduce the heeling angle? C.A. Marchaj wrote in his "Sailing Theory and Practice":
"We can conclude immediately from either pair of these equations that the drag not only lowers the driving force FR, but also increases the harmful healing force FH."

Unfortunately, to reduce the drag of traditional, single ply, low aspect ratio sails is - impossible!!!
And here we run in circles again. When serious sailing accidents and disasters occur, 'sailing authorities' become concerned. This concern, however, is only superficial; meaningful improvements are rarely ever made.
Who are those 'sailing authorities' capable of improving the sail sport? Boards of bureaucrats or specialists in the applied aerodynamics and hydrodynamics?

I believe the latter, so I invited some of them to conduct theoretical investigation and practical testing of this wingsail: WUMTIA (Wolfson Unit for Marine Technology and Industrial Aerodynamics), Yacht Research Unit of the University of Auckland, NZ, Yacht Research Unit in Kiel, Germany, Chalmers Naval Architecture, Stanford Yacht Research, MARIN (Maritime Research Institute Netherlands) and Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. The first five 'Units' operate within universities, and to me their academic curiosity should be natural and easy to provoke. As one of the Professors kindly replied: "We are always on the lookout for good research topics for project and thesis students". The last two institutions do not deal with sailing yachts exclusively, but have tackled sail aerodynamics and sailboat stability in the past. To my surprise, none of them were interested!. I certainly couldn't afford hiring their services, but since my design is patented in these countries, I was hoping that we could cooperate - they get research material for free, I get scientific evaluation, and possible involvement from the industry side shouldn't be excluded either. To the Professor from above, and his students as well, I offered three 'research topics', but apparently none of them were considered good enough. Or, perhaps the students did not show any interest. So, professors will keep teaching 'good old stuff' and students will keep learning 'amazing new things'- this is called Education!
In one of his great books, C.A. Marchaj took a provocative quote from Bertrand Russell, a great British thinker of the last century: "Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education".

Instead of giving the industry a good starting point for production, and to sailors a modern craft as advanced as modern cars or computers (anybody reading this on a 386SX?), those in charge refused to advance and instead chose to stick to inferior vested solutions - basically, to stagnate If there was similar research based on another soft wingsail, or any other effort in this direction, I wouldn't bother. Having all of this in mind, I doubt there will be a significant improvement in sailing craft speed and stability in the near future. Am I surprised by such an outcome? Yes, because I'm still a bit idealistic, and no, because I'm equally realistic. There are some other scientific branches and scientists that behave similarly. On the next page, I'll offer my opinion on some scientific matters to open minded visitors. Those who firmly want to believe that the world is perfect - better skip it (but read the Russel's quote once more).

However, there is a 'development class' that I've been working on, with the potential of becoming a new water sport. Most people call it "sailing kayak", but I prefer "microsailboat" or "personal sailing craft", since it is primarily a sailboat. However, its narrow (mono)hull allows for easy and efficient paddling in windless and adverse conditions - just like kayaks, something no other sailing craft enables. Sailboats without motors can hardly be alternatively powered. How far can sailing dinghies and boards be paddled? A couple hundred meters? Kayaks, on the other hand can be paddled for tens of miles daily. "Microsailboat" can be much more than a day sailer!



Here is how I see it:
First, it will be very 'democratic' - not subject to any rules and regulations, affordable, light, easy to handle. A 1.5 sqm wingsail could drive the boat up to 10 knots on a reach - nearly as fast as America's Cup boats. Close reaching is slower, especially on choppy waters. In order to have decent directional stability, regular ocean kayaks have to be long. On some pictures one can see the other boat I am experimenting with - a "surf kayak". Because sailboats have to be equipped with centreboards (daggerboards, leeboards), they can achieve directional stability with shorter hulls. My surf kayak is pretty short (less than 3m or 10ft) and planes at 6-7 knots of wind, but because of its particular bow, it is not very good at sailing into the wind and waves. I'm sure boat designers could easily produce a light, stable and fast boat, ergonomically optimized for sailing.
How stable is the "microsailboat"? Here is a counter-question: how stable is a bicycle? The faster it goes, the more stable it gets - the same can be applied to the "micro", and it is called the dynamic stability. Of course, unlike bikes, you can sit in a 'micro' safely at zero speed. Is it difficult to learn? No more than biking. Interestingly, nobody has ever thought about 'stabilizing' bicycles with additional wheels - except for little kids. Can anybody imagine a 'mountain-trike' storming down a steep, bumpy hill? Well, I can - and laugh. Yet, 'stabilizing' light monohulls with outriggers in order to prevent the capsizing that conventionally rigged boats are prone to, is the norm.
How close to the wind can it sail? On flat waters and moderate waves, up to 40 degrees; on choppy water, 60 degrees.
This boat does not need 'a lot of research and development' to be serially produced (as several manufacturers excused themselves for not accepting it into their production lines). Two modest stock boats rigged with my wingsails have been heavily sailed and enjoyed over the last three summers, and have proved their performance and seaworthiness. Professionally designed and made, they can only be better. I already have some promising contacts, and am pretty confident that the "micro" will be seen on the markets soon. Perhaps its appearance and success will instigate the sail use on larger craft - only time can tell. I'm using this opportunity to invite potential manufacturers to consider the many benefits of placing such a product on the market.
This is my humble contribution to the sail sport. It is free for noncommercial and personal use, but if somebody from the countries covered with my patent wishes to commercialize it, please keep in mind the royalties, which I am entitled to.

See also:"My personal thoughts on the state of some scientific affairs"

 


Additional links:

Cooke Associates : Wingsail Study
Omerwingsail
MicroTransat Challenge

 

Vancouver, BC, Canada

 

Copyright ©2001 Wing Sails Co. All Rights Reserved.

Email: wingsail@gmail.com